Well it sounds totally fine in principle; I'm wondering (without reading the patch) how you define 'we are not caching' - just no cachedirs ? That excludes mem-only caching (or perhaps thats not supported now).
-Rob
Well it sounds totally fine in principle; I'm wondering (without reading the patch) how you define 'we are not caching' - just no cachedirs ? That excludes mem-only caching (or perhaps thats not supported now).
-Rob