lör 2010-06-26 klockan 14:24 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov: > That is better. Although, in the ideal world, it is Squid2 that should > be more specific and we could just use trunk for Squid3, Squid4, etc.
Don't think there will be a Squid-4 any time soon, but who knows. For me Squid-2 is not a branch. It's a trunk (2.HEAD), just not as active as the Squid-3 trunk. But I see your point. Regards Henrik
