> I'm not sure its fully worth doing this. > > * the "transparent" options are all due for a naming upgrade or > removal in the next major release anyway.
Okay, I'm happy to leave as is. However, I would still suggest a review of the naming in the upgrade (see below). > > * linux-netfilter in fact enables both NAT (intercept) and TPROXY > (transparent) capture methods. And is documented so far as applying to > all supported netfilter targets. So naming for one specific of the two > (or three now that MARK is being added) is not reducing the confusion. Correct, I overlooked the NAT aspect, so probably best leaving it for the time being. I've added the configure option --with-netfilter-conntrack for the MARK patch, but maybe to make things clearer the options should be more like: --with-linux-netfilter and --with-linux-netfilter-conntrack This makes it a bit clearer that the two are related but separate. Thoughts? [[ Sorry, I'm still not on this mailing list and thus unable to reply to list emails. I've tried to subscribe twice in the last fortnight and have also emailed [email protected], all with no luck. Could somebody add me please? In the interim, please copy me on posts, as I am currently using the web archives. ]] Thanks, Andy
