lör 2010-08-21 klockan 20:07 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > IMO some of them such as the malloc/calloc/free which only force a > xfoo() version internal to Squid to be hard-coded should be done with a > real symbol swap-in in the relevant header files. That way the code can > go to using malloc/calloc/free and our custom wrappers plug-in silently > to src/ code where appropriate.
Not entirely sure what you mean. If you mean that free() should silently redirect to xfree() in src/ then I disagree. The two have slightly different usage. > Others like sprintf which are still actually enforcing non-use of unsafe > functions should stay. Many compilers and most auditing tools barfs on sprintf etc these days. Not sure why gcc do not.. Regards Henrik
