tis 2011-01-11 klockan 17:53 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: > 1) N > 2 and our name is not localhost or similar. > 2) N > 10.
I would make the latter N > 5, or perhaps even drop the "localhost or similar" check entirely just using N > 2. It's a good thing if the admin notices the localhost host name issue and understands that it's a problem to chain proxies under such conditions. > No checks for the port mode or transaction flags (intercepted, > accelerated, etc.). > > In addition to the above, do a startup check for the name and warn the > user if our name is localhost or similar. Yes, and also each time logs are rotated so it doesn't get lost. > Would that address all the concerns voiced so far? Yes. Regards Henrik
