On Aug 12, 2011, at 15:08, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 12/08/11 23:34, Kinkie wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Gnu++0x looks good, but then what about non-gnu compilers? Oh WHY do
>> they have to be strict ANSI? I curse thee, standards committee!
>>
>
> One of the benefits we gain is eyeballs on all these problems and a reason to
> document all the weirdness.
>
> FWIW; I skipped gnu++0x after reading the list of features they supported
> which are still experimental or were rejected from the spec.
>
> The tests detect both of them properly, but so far only enables the -std set
> so we only get the pieces which are officially accepted.
>
> Amos
Also I was wrong regarding the configure test for strtoll() but I have no idea
what it actually tests because it seems to succeed.
configure:29430: checking for strtoll
configure:29430: clang++ -o conftest -g -O2 -std=c++0x -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include -g -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib
-pthread c
onftest.cpp -lm >&5
configure:29430: $? = 0
configure:29430: result: yes
There are also a lot of configure tests that fail for reasons not even remotely
related to what they are testing for...
configure:25717: checking for struct rusage
configure:25717: clang++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++0x -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include conftest.cpp >&5
configure:25717: $? = 0
configure:25717: clang++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++0x -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include conftest.cpp >&5
conftest.cpp:215:28: error: expected expression
if (sizeof ((struct rusage)))
^
1 error generated.
Where the double parentheses come from I have no idea.
You can find a full config.log with CC=clang CXX=clang++ here:
http://pes.vlakno.cz/~pwo/squid3-clang-config.log
--
Pawel
