ons 2011-08-10 klockan 22:15 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov: > I agree that Have-Digest or similar custom "digest" entity-tag can be > used with If-None-Match. You gain the advantages of the existing > If-None-Match mechanism. You also gain problems associated with > overloading an end-to-end mechanism with hop-by-hop optimizations:
If-None-Match is not an end-to-end condition in the strict sense. > I am not sure whether the pros outweigh the cons in this case, but I > think using If-None-Match should be seriously considered. Regardless of > this decision, the most complex and performance-expensive elements of > the duplicate suppression proposal remain the same though. Indeed. Regards Henrik
