On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:55:10 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
mån 2011-08-15 klockan 23:26 +0200 skrev Kinkie:
Webbrowser is exactly what I was thinking of. It'd allow us to get
rid
of cachemgr.cgi.
Well, users browsing this direcly via webbrowsers would always prefer
HTML I think?
And if they access it programmatically via scripting in the browser
then
Accept can easily be controlled.
Regards
Henrik
Yes, I was hoping to support Accept: as well. Have not got there yet.
Posted this a bit early so Kinkie and Arthur can use it for their
projects and don't re-invent different ways of sending format in.
Amos
