tor 2012-04-26 klockan 18:39 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: > ons 2012-04-25 klockan 18:12 -0700 skrev Andrew Scherkus: > > > I tested out the http11 option on squid/2.7 and caching worked as > > expected in both Chromium and Firefox. I suppose my questions are: > > 1) Should squid really be returning HTTP/1.0 on 206 responses when > > 206 was defined as part of HTTP/1.1? > > Imho yes. And Apache also agrees on this. > > Why do you think it's not? What problem do you see from HTTP/1.0 206 > responses?
A related note is that at least Apache agrees with us, and happily answers with HTTP/1.0 206 when seeing an HTTP/1.0 Range request. I also have not heard of any interop issues before your mail, and Squid have been doing this since 1996. Regards Henrik
