lör 2012-07-28 klockan 18:40 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > *** We have 15 days to get this updated correctly. > > The SPONSORS file is supposed to: > > * list Sponsors who paid for significant developments in the squid code, > donated hardware for devleopment etc. > > * exclude cash donations to the project (only cash to a developer for > specific work) > > * in an ordered list broken down in reverse-chronological order of the > latest release they sponsored anything. > > For simplicity I'm adding @Squid-X.Y labels at the boundaries for the bzr > copy, not sure whether to keep them in the final packaged copy. Comments?
Depends on the option below. For simplicity it's I think it's better to keep a single record per sponsor, and moving them to the top if active for the current release, extending the blurb when appropriate. > Another option is to list sponsors under each version when they contributed > multiple times. > That looks a little messy with the ongoing sponsors (Treehouse, Measrement > Factory etc) so have not done it for this draft. That would require a lot of detail on what was sponsored in each release to make sense, and would result in quite a lot of duplication for some sponsors. Regards Henrik
