On 06.08.2012 03:56, Kinkie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Amos Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/08/2012 12:22 a.m., Kinkie wrote:

Hi,
v2 addresses (or at least triest to) address all your suggestions,
plus it changes DBG_CRITICAL and DBG_IMPORTANT across the whole
source,


Hmm. okay. I was only requesting the new added/modified lines for now. The source-wide should probably be done as a separate update which can be ported
to 3.2 later.

It should be possible to cherrypick that specific revision from the
feature-branch, it's all done in one commit, or I can simply reproduce
(it's a regex-replace in eclipse, after all)

Okay. Please do then. +10 on that by itself.



  and changes CBDATA_CLASS* positions everywhere.


Does Squid still build fine? Last time I tried to move one it failed to build cleanly afterwards. I'm not entirely confident we have unit-test
coverage to test them all either.

Yes, it does. They're just a few (half a dozen, maybe). Also, most are
CBDATA_CLASS which don't play the same private: trickery as
CBDATA_CLASS2.

Was only asking to mark them for later attention so they are easy to find
again.

Whoops, I misunderstood. Should I revert?

Easy to cherrypick as well? Since you've already done the work I see no reason not to merge it to trunk as a stand-alone commit just in case anything goes badly afterwards.

Amos

Reply via email to