On 09/13/2012 12:12 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
Is it a 200 OK response. Suspect it's a 304?
Thanks, WIll check maybe it is. ..checked.. not 302 a fully 200 response.
1347525419.744 116 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 767 GET http://www1.ngtech.co.il/302.html - HIER_DIRECT/79.181.232.109 text/html 1347525421.880 12 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 767 GET http://www1.ngtech.co.il/302.html - HIER_DIRECT/79.181.232.109 text/html 1347525870.740 143 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 767 GET http://www1.ngtech.co.il/302.html - HIER_DIRECT/79.181.232.109 text/html 1347525873.614 9 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 767 GET http://www1.ngtech.co.il/302.html - HIER_DIRECT/79.181.232.109 text/html 1347526129.689 311 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 767 GET http://www1.ngtech.co.il/302.html - HIER_DIRECT/79.181.232.109 text/html 1347526131.798 8 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 767 GET http://www1.ngtech.co.il/302.html - HIER_DIRECT/79.181.232.109 text/html
these are all the access.log records in squid. (The delay there is because it's on wireless.) The sources are from the 3.trunk from a week ago. Eliezer
