On 11/22/2012 10:28 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 11/11/2012 6:28 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: >> Updated patch attache, containing the updates below... >> > > If there is no objections I will commit this to trunk soon. It has > passed 10+ days with no additional followup.
FYI: Your last response indicated that more changes would follow so the ball was on your side, not the reviewers side: >>>>>> The response syntax for all helpers becomes: >>>>>> [channel-ID SP ] result [ SP key-pair ... ] [ SP other] EOL >>>>>> + * line := [ result ] *#( key-pair ) >>>>> There is such a thing as "key:value pair", but "key-pair" does not >>>>> make >>>>> sense to me. I suggest replacing "key-pair" with "key=value" or >>>>> "note". >>>>> The latter would need to be spelled out separately, of course. >>>> Would kv-pair, the other way of writing it be more familiar? >>> Yes, I think "kv-pair" would be better (and it appears to be more widely >>> used than "key-pair", which is usually found in "a pair of public and >>> private keys" context. "Key-value pair" appears to be "standard" for our >>> context, even with its own wikipedia entry. >>> >> >> Okay will do. Alex.
