On 02/01/2013 04:01 AM, Kinkie wrote: > Is there any objection for me to entertain myself doing "int" -> > "intXX_t" and "unisgned int -> uintXX_t" conversions in the meanwhile? > This seems to be in line with c++11 changes, and should have no > adverse effects.
The immediate adverse effect would be conflicts with other pending features, of course. What is the motivation behind this? Why intXX_t is better than int when we do not really care about the exact variable size? Thank you, Alex.
