On 07/25/2013 12:53 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I have been playing with the idea of locking these into memory cache, or > using a dedicated memory area just for them to avoid the speed issues.
I do not think we should do that complex optimization, at least not until _after_ we are done with fully supporting Vary functionality. Correctly maintaining a specialized [shared] memory cache for x-vary objects is difficult. Moreover, that special cache becomes an unnecessary burden if our caching code optimizes access to popular objects. I would rather see us focus on the latter optimization because it would help with all transactions, not just Vary. $0.02, Alex.
