On 10/14/2013 09:28 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> Another idea is whether to add a name= parameter to the cache_dir and
> have "cache X allow/deny ..." rules per storage area. To go a little
> further than min/max object sizes.

I think the above should be done by adding cache_dir (and memory cache)
matching ACLs instead of a mandatory "cache X" parameter naming a
cache_dir (or memory cache).

Alex.

Reply via email to