On 17/11/2013 9:13 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Just wanted to say this is the first time I have been seen a thread > about it. > If we will define it in the squid.conf as one of the main component it > will might look differently. > > On 11/16/2013 06:11 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> For quite some time I have been trying to get the package distributors >> to handle our mime.conf file as a Squid-specific config file, which gets >> FHS $(sysconf) installation instead of a Squid a data file, which gets >> FHS $(datadir) installation. > OK a list of packages options: > apt(deb) > yum(rpm) > emerge(dont remeber? ebuild?) > pkgtool\installpkg(slackware..) > any others? > > Instead of jumping to change the file name can we *try* to "ping" these > package distributors\maintainers and notify them that there is a meaning > to this file name?(2 pings and then drop the route...)?
I have been doing so every few months or so for the last ~5 years. Even sending patches against their packaging. Some changed, some didn't. Amos
