tis 2014-01-21 klockan 14:37 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: > [FWIW, the term "FTP Gateway" was suggested by Henrik during initial RFC > review. Henrik thought that using HTTP semantics internally means we are > a "gateway". I changed the project name in order to avoid having an > argument. Technically, it is not really clear whether we are using HTTP > semantics internally or not. We are using HTTP structures, but semantics > is a very gray area IMO.]
The old code is a gateway, translating between protocol. If you are just piggy-backing on internal http structures to transparently carry FTP semantics without actually being able to translate protocols then it's not a gateway only a relay. Regards henrik
