On 25/04/2014 12:46 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Do not leak implicit ACLs during reconfigure.
> 
> Many ACLs implicitly created by Squid when grouping multiple ACLs were
> not destroyed because those implicit ACLs where not covered by the
> global ACL registry used for ACL destruction.
> 
> See also: r13210 which did not go far enough because it incorrectly
> assumed that all InnerNode() children are aclRegister()ed and, hence,
> will be centrally freed.
> 
> Alex.
> 

-0.

I believe we should move to reference counting ACLs instead of
continuing to work around these edge cases.

Amos

Reply via email to