On 25/04/2014 12:46 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: > Do not leak implicit ACLs during reconfigure. > > Many ACLs implicitly created by Squid when grouping multiple ACLs were > not destroyed because those implicit ACLs where not covered by the > global ACL registry used for ACL destruction. > > See also: r13210 which did not go far enough because it incorrectly > assumed that all InnerNode() children are aclRegister()ed and, hence, > will be centrally freed. > > Alex. >
-0. I believe we should move to reference counting ACLs instead of continuing to work around these edge cases. Amos