Personally, I use multiple cache dirs; that way, if a disk fails, the other ones are still online and cached (assuming you're using Squid 2.x). Mirror is a waste of disk for caches, and linear makes the benefits above disappear. I even would make an argument against HW RAID; although I haven't tested well, it would take a lot to convince me that RAID does better than Squid, which knows a lot more about the makeup of the data, and can evenly spread it across multiple disks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 4:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Raid0 vs Linear vs Multiple Cache Dirs > > > Simple question, hard answer: > 1 System. 128 MB RAM 3 x 1 Gig Drives (independant controllers) > Which is best for performance? SW-Raid0, SW-Linear, or simply 3 > cache-dirs? Thanks! > > Stephen Anderson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
RE: Raid0 vs Linear vs Multiple Cache Dirs
Nottingham, Mark (Australia) Wed, 24 Feb 1999 01:02:03 -0500
- Raid0 vs Linear vs Multiple Cache Dirs Stephen Anderson
- Re: Raid0 vs Linear vs Multiple Cache Di... Henrik Nordstrom
- Nottingham, Mark (Australia)
