Steffen Ullrich wrote: > 4) I think URL's with '?' in it should be cachable (but maybe set > Expires to 0 unless a Expires header is given). For contents which > should not be cached POST requests or a proberly defined Expires > header should be used I agree 100%. My recommendation is to * NOT add the recommended no_cache lines. * Instead use appropriate refresh patterns. ? and cgi-bin MUST match a refresh pattern with min age of 0. refresh_pattern \? 0 20% 4320 refresh_pattern cgi-bin 0 20% 4320 * Use the recommended hierarchy_stoplist to avoid traversing a cache hierarchy on cgi or query request. --- Henrik Nordstrom Spare time Squid hacker
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Ole Moller
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheser... Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cach... David J Woolley
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cach... Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver David J Woolley
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Steffen Ullrich
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver David J Woolley
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver David J Woolley
- Re: Querystring vs. Squid Cacheserver Henrik Nordstrom
- UNSUBSCRIBE Markus Gallagher
- Re: UNSUBSCRIBE Amitabh Patnaik
