Just did a trace; it does indeed use WPAD by default (although the 'automatically detect settings' button is off... odd). I only hope that Netscape can swallow its collective pride and implement a MS-backed standard; this is a good one. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nottingham, Mark (Australia) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 2:12 PM > To: 'Dax Kelson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: have proxies hit the big time? (fwd) > > > From what I saw in the betas, WPAD support was turned off by default. > Anybody know if this the case in the release version? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dax Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 1:12 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: have proxies hit the big time? (fwd) > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:57:28 -0800 > > From: John Giannandrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: have proxies hit the big time? > > > > > > > > The newly released IE5 has a proxy autodiscovery feature which has > > significant practical implications for global bandwidth use. > > > > Its hard to know how many web clients are proxied today. Its > > probably much > > less than 50% (including AOL users). The main reason appears > > to be that most > > clients are not configured for it by default. > > > > With IE5, if ISPs create a CNAME called wpad and provide a > > file called wpad.dat > > on port 80 that uses the Netscape proxy guidelines: > > > http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/2.0/relnotes/demo/proxy-live.html > > Then IE5 will automatically use those proxies for HTTP. This > > is as transparent to > > the end user as dynamic IP assignment or HTTP redirection. > > > > 12 months from now when the majority of PCs are shipping with > > this as the > > default browser, it would seem that proxies will be > > significantly more relevant > > to traffic shaping than they are today. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
RE: have proxies hit the big time? (fwd)
Nottingham, Mark (Australia) Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:18:58 -0500
- have proxies hit the big time? (fwd) Dax Kelson
- Re: have proxies hit the big time? (fwd) tom minchin
- Re: have proxies hit the big time? (... Jason Haar
- RE: have proxies hit the big time? (fwd) Nottingham, Mark (Australia)
- RE: have proxies hit the big time? (fwd) Nottingham, Mark (Australia)
- RE: have proxies hit the big time? (... Dax Kelson
