On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Patrick Mau wrote:
> I would be really disappointed if this is true, because Cache-Digests
> are expensive if you have multiple peers and a low-bandwidth link.
Cache Digests are less expensive than ICP in almost any environment
where peering makes sense. Current implementation of Cache Digests
may be more expensive sometimes, but a few essential changes are on the
way, including "deltas" that solve the problem you are describing:
http://squid.nlanr.net/Squid/FAQ/FAQ-16.html#ss16.7
Alex.
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Steven Sporen
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Patrick Mau
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Oskar Pearson
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP por... Alex Rousskov
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP... Dancer
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP... Alex Rousskov
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP... Oskar Pearson
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP... Alex Rousskov
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Alex Rousskov
- Re: Squid 2 - ?huh? why two ICP ports? Oskar Pearson
