Pawel Pierscionek wrote: > > > I should think it's safe for the application's value to be higher than > > the kernel's, but dangerous to the life of the app to have it the other > > way around. > > > Squid ./configure says: > ... > checking Default FD_SETSIZE value... 3072 > checking Maximum number of filedescriptors we can open... 3000 > ... > > May this be a problem ? > Kernel is compiled with FD_SETSIE=3072 Hmm, 3072 sounds right for 3000 FDs. It was the right number last time I did the math, anyway. It _should_ work. I've got dozens of proxies that use this particular setup. D
- FDs & linux again. Pawel Pierscionek
- Re: FDs & linux again. Henrik Nordstrom
- Re[2]: FDs & linux again. Pawel Pierscionek
- Re: FDs & linux again. Dancer
- Re: FDs & linux ag... Pawel Pierscionek
- Re: FDs & lin... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: FDs & lin... Dancer
- Re: FDs & linux again. Duane Wessels
- Re[2]: FDs & linux again. Pawel Pierscionek
- Re: FDs & linux again. Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar
- Re: FDs & linux ag... Pawel Pierscionek
- Re: FDs & lin... David J Woolley
- Re: FDs & linux again. Pedro Ribeiro
- Re: FDs & linux again. Fraser Campbell
- Re: FDs & linux again. Oskar Pearson
- Re: Re[2]: FDs & linux again. Miquel van Smoorenburg
