David J Woolley wrote: > Squid cannot currently cache this. It has been said that there is > enough information to permit it to be cached, but that was before > there was a change in the handling of the length field for 304 > responses, so I'm not sure that it is still possible. It is teoretically possible, but Squid is not well suited to do it (yet). It belongs to the category of caching partial objects, which is not yet supported. -- Henrik Nordstrom Spare time Squid hacker
- squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate Greg Tillman
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate David J Woolley
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate Greg Tillman
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate David J Woolley
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate Marc van Selm
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS ... David J Woolley
- Re: squid 2.2 STABLE1 and TCP_MISS rate Henrik Nordstrom
