On 24/04/2015 6:26 a.m., Nick Rogers wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> > wrote: > >> On 23/04/2015 9:14 a.m., Nick Rogers wrote: >>> After upgrading from 3.4.x to 3.5.x, I've noticed a new error message >> with >>> my squid configuration. Apparently squid 3.5 no longer allows setting the >>> two lower-most ECN bits of the ToS byte. >> >> Allowing it and leaving it up to admin was causing too much confusion >> over mysteriously dropped traffic. >> >> Attempts to bit-shift values were not backward compatible. So instead we >> opted to take a bitmask hex value as the TOS parameter and explicitly >> forbid with warning the ECN bits being set in that mask. >> > > Can you elaborate on how you would bit-shift the values to still use the > ECN field and not cause mysterious problems. For example, using ECN bits of > 00 and 11, but not 01 or 10?
Sure. We experimented with taking the config value N and using TOS value (N<<2) for IPv4 and N for IPv6. Didn't work out well. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
