On 10/06/2015 12:35 p.m., TarotApprentice wrote:
> In the examples on the squid site it gives a multi-worker example using carp 
> (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/SmpCarpCluster). Now that rock 
> storage has been updated with 3.5.5 is that still the best approach?
> 
> I was thinking of a single rock cache so the workers could share it rather 
> than the example which has a shared rock cache plus each worker having its 
> own aufs cache. I need to cache windows updates which can get fairly big and 
> would rather not duplicate them between workers.
> 

It is still far better to use UFS caches for large objects.

Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Reply via email to