Your are right fred, It is is a difficult deal for us too...
aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()", HTTP reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with squid crashes ( watchdog)
diskd -> more stable but slower... Le 15/07/2015 12:46, FredB a écrit :
Just a little word about aufs, just for information, to avoid squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion I had increase this value (sorry I can't remember the exact number) --with-aufs-threads=xxx But the "load average" - top counter - was very important and I should back to diskd So only diskd could works good (rock store was worst than aufs ...), with my load and my usage, but perhaps I should test with a more recent version Tested on Debian _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users