there is a way to improve it? 2015-09-18 8:25 GMT-03:00 Antony Stone <antony.st...@squid.open.source.it>:
> On Friday 18 September 2015 at 13:13:27, Jorgeley Junior wrote: > > > hey guys, forgot-me? :( > > Surely you can see for yourself how many connections you've had of > different > types? Here are the most common (all those over 100 instances) from your > list > of 5240 results > > > > 290 TAG_NONE/503 > > > 368 TCP_DENIED/403 > > > 1421 TCP_DENIED/407 > > > 680 TCP_MISS/200 > > > 192 TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/304 > > > 1896 TCP_TUNNEL/200 > > So: > > 290 (5.5%) got a 503 result (service unavailable) > 368 (7%) were denied by the remote server with code 403 (forbidden) > 1421 (27%) were deined by the remote server with code 407 (auth required) > 680 (13%) were successfully retreived from the remote servers but were not > previously in your cache > 192 (3.6%) were already cached by your browser and didn't need to be > retreived > 1896 (36%) were successful HTTPS tunneled connections, simply being > forwarded > by the proxy > > This accounts for 4847 (92.5%) of your 5240 results. > > As you can see, just measuring HIT and MISS is not the whole picture. > > > Hope that helps, > > > Antony. > > -- > Pavlov is in the pub enjoying a pint. > The barman rings for last orders, and Pavlov jumps up exclaiming "Damn! I > forgot to feed the dog!" > > Please reply to the > list; > please *don't* CC > me. > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > --
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
