2015-12-16 12:58 GMT+01:00 Amos Jeffries <[email protected]>: > On 16/12/2015 11:12 p.m., Antonio Petrelli wrote: > > Hello > > sorry if this question has been asked, and answered, already, I dug the > > mailing list archive but it is still not clear to me. > > > > Is it possible to use a cache_peer that supports NTLM authentication in a > > "transparent" way, so that the user of the Squid proxy does not need to > > enter any authentication and Squid does all the authentication by itself? > > No that is not supported. And we have no intention of adding it, NTLM > has been deprected for nearly 10 years. > > Squid supports performing Negotiate/Kerberos authentication to > cache_peer instead. > > > > Notice that, until now, I am using CNTLM to do this, however CNTLM has > > severe problems under Windows 8. > > Notice that NTLM has increasingly severe problems under any Windows XP > SP3 or later system. > > Thank you. Notice that I asked this question because I would like to use Squid as a personal local proxy for different type of upstream proxy, so that a user can use their Squid instance on their machine and the only thing to do is switch the correct configuration file when switching workplace. Currently I do it by using Squid or CNTLM when needed and I also wrote a proxy in Java for it, however it is really memory-consuming, especially compared to Squid: https://github.com/apetrelli/scafa
Thank you anyway for your answer and sorry for the rant Antonio
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
