On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Alex Rousskov < rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> > I cannot answer your question for aufs, but please note that rock > cache_dirs do not support/have/use a configurable replacement policy: > Each incoming object is assigned a slot based on its key hash. With > modern rock code, it is possible to remove that limitation IIRC, but > nobody have done that. > Yeah I figured this out from the source code and I'm extremely surprised by the fact that it was never mentioned in documentation. I think it will be a huge blocker in our squid 4 + SMP + rock migration plan. So what does rock do when storage is full then? > > > > If you're wondering why would we need to know that – it's related to > > GDPR and removing data of closed customer's accounts. We need to make > > sure that we don't have any "not being accessed anymore" objects older > > than "data retention period" days. > > If it is important to get this right, then I would not trust replacement > policy metadata with this: The corresponding code interfaces look > unreliable to me, and access counts/timestamps for a ufs-based cache_dir > are not updated across Squid restarts when the swap log is lost (at least). > > It's actually fine, we never restart squid and if it restarted by any unexpected reason (host reboot, crash or w/e) we just replace the host. > I would instead configure Squid to prohibit serving hits that are too > old. That solution does not match your problem exactly, but it may be > good enough and should work a lot more reliably across all cache_dirs. > If there is no "age" ACL to use with the send_hit directive, then you > may need to add one. > > http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/send_hit/ > > You may also be able to accomplish the same using refresh_pattern, but I > am a little worroed about various exceptional/special conditions > implemented on top of that directive. Others on this list may offer > better guidance in this area. > > I was thinking about similar solution but this is exactly why I wasn't able to use it – there seems to be no acl suitable for such task. We can always just replace the host every month or something like this but it'll mean starting with a cold cache every time which I wanted to avoid. I found this debug option for heap which could probably help in understanding of approximate cache age but it doesn't work with rock because rock uses some "simple scan" policy. > src/repl/heap/store_repl_heap.cc: debugs(81, 3, "Heap age set to " << h->theHeap->age); > HTH, > > Alex. > -- With best regards, Ivan Larionov.
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users