On 04/13/2018 02:41 PM, MK2018 wrote:
> Alex Rousskov wrote
>> Believe it or not, there are still many Squid use cases where bumping is
>> unnecessary. This includes, but is not limited to, HTTPS proxying cases
>> with peek/splice/terminate rules and environments where Squid possesses
>> the certificate issued by CAs trusted by clients. There are also IETF
>> attempts to standardize transmission of encrypted but proxy-cachable
>> I agree that Squid user base will shrink if nobody can bump 3rd party
>> traffic, but that reduction alone will not kill Squid.
> I would definitely disagree.
With what? Nothing you said afterwards contradicts what I said above.
squid-users mailing list