Hello Henrik, thank you very much, i've just enabling the log_mime_hdrs. i'll tell my clients to give it a try tommorow and check the log files. because it's sunday now :P
thankyou again everyone see u again ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 2:58 AM Subject: Re: [squid-users] just finished setting up squid 2.4 STABLE7 + Redhat 8 (kernel 2.4) and + IPTABLES v1.2.6a > There is three main cases to why Squid does not cache all http > request: > > a) The server has marked the reply as not cacheable. See the > cacheability check engine (linked from Related Software). > > b) The client requests a fresh copy not from cache. > > c) The server did not provide any relevant expiry information, making > Squid assume the object is dynamically created. > > > For detailed analysis on what is your case, enable log_mime_hdrs, and > then send a log with two requests > 1. The first request, which supposedly should have made the obejct > cached. > 2. A second request, which supposedly should have been a HIT but which > was a MISS: > > Regards > Henrik > > > > On Saturday 25 January 2003 20.49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > i've just finished installing squid on my linux box, and it seems > > to work for caching HTTP request for my betea tester clients. > > Right now my next target it to cache the FTP request too, > > because most of my clients using some update program to request the > > data from main ftp server (just like when you update Norton Anti > > Virus database file, but the "update" that my client's requesting > > is very big abuot 70Mb/update that's why i need to cache it) > > But as far as i understand squid cannot act as FTP transparent > > proxy that's why the squid only accept traffic to destination port > > 80. (please correct me if i'm wrong) > > > > Actually the program that my client's are using support http > > request update too, but when i checked the log squid said like > > this. as i understand that it always TCP_MISS and DIRECT, has > > anyone can tell me what can i do to cache these request ? > > is it easier to fix this or just use the other program like frox ? > > > > 1043383117.475 3878 192.168.10.34 TCP_MISS/200 361 GET > > http://ftp.ibmlink.ibm.com/econfig/ECFXF_ACTIVE_DIR.CTL - > > DIRECT/207.25.249.17 text/plain > > 1043383129.853 12324 192.168.10.34 TCP_MISS/200 11871 GET > > http://ftp.ibmlink.ibm.com/econfig/FXFDIR2/NMFD_SERVER_DEFAULT_CONT > >ROL.SER - DIRECT/207.25.249.17 text/plain > > 1043383148.619 12592 192.168.10.34 TCP_MISS/200 665 GET > > http://ftp.ibmlink.ibm.com/econfig/FXFDIR2/STAGE/AP%20AS400/NMFD_SE > >RVER_CRCT ABLE.SER - DIRECT/207.25.249.17 text/plain > > 1043383154.746 6086 192.168.10.34 TCP_MISS/200 677 GET > > http://ftp.ibmlink.ibm.com/econfig/FXFDIR2/STAGE/AP%20AS400%20SOFTW > >ARE/NMFD_ SERVER_CRCTABLE.SER - DIRECT/207.25.249.17 text/plain > > 1043383161.082 6323 192.168.10.34 TCP_MISS/200 679 GET > > http://ftp.ibmlink.ibm.com/econfig/FXFDIR2/STAGE/AP%20RS6000%20SOFT > >WARE/NMFD _SERVER_CRCTABLE.SER - DIRECT/207.25.249.17 text/plain > > 1043383173.742 12646 192.168.10.34 TCP_MISS/200 669 GET > > http://ftp.ibmlink.ibm.com/econfig/FXFDIR2/STAGE/AP%20RS6000/NMFD_S > >ERVER_CRC TABLE.SER - DIRECT/207.25.249.17 text/plain > > > > Has anybody having the same problem like i do ? > > Thank you very very much. > > > > Best Regards > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Network Engineer > > www.perkomonline.com > >
