oh, when i test it with wbinfo like
wbinfo -a domain\\user%password

it just return plaintext password ok, haven't test with challenge.
but i have built the samba with --with-winbind-auth-challenge
is there any miss for configing the samba ?

thanks for advice

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Fw: NTLM authenication problem


> and the command line tests indicated that it was workng correctly?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed, 19. March 2003 7:31 PM
> > To: squid-users
> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Fw: NTLM authenication problem
> > 
> > 
> > i've build samba with this options
> > 
> >         --with-winbind
> >         --with-winbind-auth-challenge (needed for ntlm)
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Simon Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 4:28 PM
> > Subject: RE: [squid-users] Fw: NTLM authenication problem
> > 
> > 
> > > Did you build Samba with the -with-nt-auth-challenge (or 
> > similar) option?
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Wed, 19. March 2003 6:49 PM
> > > > To: squid-users
> > > > Subject: [squid-users] Fw: NTLM authenication problem
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > 
> > > > I've got a problem of using NTLM authenication. I've follow the 
> > > > intruction at FAQ
> > > > http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-23.html#ss23.5  to 
> > > > configure the samba, winbindd and squid.
> > > > 
> > > >  i can test the winbindd user authentication and return ok
> > > >  i can test the wb_auth helpers and return ok.
> > > > 
> > > >  but when I test with IE, a password dialog is appear and ask me 
> > > > to enter the username,password and domain. it can't let me through
> > > > even I have enter a correct password.
> > > > 
> > > > Please help!!!
> > > > 
> > > >  Thanks!!
> > > > 
> > > 
> 


Reply via email to