* Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When MARA Systems last played with reiserfs we found it quite > sensitive to I/O errors. If a harddrive went bad then it easily could > produce kernel panics, while ext2 just gave errors in most cases. > Admittedly this was nearly three years ago and quite likely things > most likely have improved considerably since then. Have not tested > how ext3 behaves under such conditions.
Like ext2 > reiserfs however showed to be quite fast and space efficient, > especially on small files quite commonly seen in a Squid cache. Yup. And since the cache may be lost due to fs corruption, why not use ReiserFS? Our argumentation is the same for XFS: It's fast, and good for data that may be lost. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite Campus Mitte Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 AIM: ralfpostfix
