"Ethy H. Brito" wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:20:24 +0200 > "Marc Elsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Couldn find anything in the logs that mention access or store log > > > files. > > Any extra info in the beginning of cache.log and the end of > > cache.log.0 > > when this is being tried (examine both files (!)). ? > > Surprisingly YES. A SEG Violation in all of cache.log.[0-3] files. > Look: > > # head cache.log > > 2003/06/10 04:00:00| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting... > FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying. > 2003/06/10 04:00:02| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting... > 2003/06/10 04:00:02| Finished. Wrote 5566 entries. > 2003/06/10 04:00:02| Took 0.0 seconds (118362.6 entries/sec). > CPU Usage: 65.560 seconds = 45.030 user + 20.530 sys > Maximum Resident Size: 0 KB > Page faults with physical i/o: 340 > Memory usage for squid via mallinfo(): > total space in arena: 7300 KB > Ordinary blocks: 7279 KB 23 blks > Small blocks: 0 KB 0 blks > Holding blocks: 192 KB 1 blks > Free Small blocks: 0 KB > Free Ordinary blocks: 20 KB > Total in use: 7471 KB 102% > Total free: 20 KB 0% > 2003/06/10 04:00:12| Starting Squid Cache version 2.5.STABLE3-20030605 > for i586- pc-linux-gnu... > 2003/06/10 04:00:12| Process ID 2323 > > > > > Which version of squid are you using ? > > On which platform/os/version ? > > squid-2.5.STABLE3-20030605 > Linux Slackware 9.0 Kernel 2.4.20 on a Pentium 166Mhz w/128MB RAM > > What now? Since, this is about the latest release, I guess filing a bug report would be the most appropriat thing to do ,
M.
