now u mentioned it, i just did a check, i also did a squid-2.5-stable3 compile, with many options as u can see, my size is 8983599, i think its normal, considering the new improvements and patches done on the code, the development size, well just as u said, i concur
Maybe Henrik will be in a better position to say, but i think its normal, works for me and am happy -:)
my config
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/squid --enable-dl-malloc --enable-delay-pools --enable-gnuregex --enable-useragent-log --enable-ssl --enable-linux-netfilter --enable-underscores --enable-removal-policies --enable-snmp --enable-kill-parent-hack --enable-referer-log --enable-useragent-log --enable-icap-support
by the way this is on my rh8
, Hi Everyone,
Now this is just weird. I threw together a Red Hat 9 box to be a small gateway router and compiled up squid like I have done many times before. At first I was using the 3.0 devel version and figured it's 13 Meg binary size was just a factor of being the development code. Then I looked at the 2.5-stable3 which I compiled up at the same time, 5.6 Megs! What on earth ?
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 719004 Jun 24 23:26 squid-2.5-stable1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5604909 Jun 24 23:24 squid-2.5-stable3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13064264 Jun 14 21:59 squid.3.0-devel
These are the 3 squid binaries on the machine. The first one is the /usr/sbin/squid which installed itself with Red Hat 9, then come the 2 binaries I compiled from source code using the usual % ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/squid % make all % make install
I'm not noticing the same bloated binaries with the few other things I have compiled, mrtg is 77k, webalizer is 129k, basically as expected.
Anyone else seeing this ?
- Scott.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
