On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 21:48, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On 11 Aug 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > > > Ermm, you don't need bonding for load balancing here: A simple /32 route > > on each dial up interface in the ISP, and propogated using some IGP (one > > ISP needed) will allow traffic to be roughly-distributed over multiple > > links with disparate IP's. > > True, but bonding makes life considerably easier for all parties involved > escpecially in dial-up situations where the links are not dedicated at the > ISP.
Not significantly IMO, standard proportional-weighted routing is pretty easy to setup :}. > Note: I count multilink-PPP as a form of bonding in this discussion. Yep, so do I. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
