Thanks for your response all. In regards to the form of load balancing, this is what I got froma dig....
;; ANSWER SECTION: www.national.com.au. 469 IN CNAME www.bal.national.com.au. www.bal.national.com.au. 10 IN A 203.57.241.101 www.bal.national.com.au. 10 IN A 203.57.240.101 Maybe it is round robined.....I spose the CNAME would do the same thing. I can't get anything useful out of the helpdesk though. Does this help? On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:46, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 14 August 2003 00.15, Mick Reichelt wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > I am running squid 2.4STABLE1 and was wondering if anyone has > > experienced any problems with squid accessing load balanced sites. > > I am having this problem, where a particular site (national.com.au) > > which squid just doesn't want to have a bar of. I have tried the > > no_cache option and still no joy. Any help would be appreciated. > > > Maybe this site is using the same broken firewall as another user > reported problems with a while ago. Apparently this was a Cisco PIX > configured to do HTTP filtering.. see > http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/#squid-2.5.STABLE3-hostheader > for a possible workaround. > > The workaround does not address the problem to 100% as the problem is > the broken firewall, but will at least make proxied requests not work > much worse than non-proxied requests with these broken firewalls > which should make it more obvious who to blaim when there is > problems.. > > Regards > Henrik > > > -- > Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful. > https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org > > If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or > firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden > http://www.marasystems.com/, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
