Adam, I'm afraid you're wrong. ntlm_auth shipped with squid 2.5 latest tarrball work perfectly with samba3!!!!!!
:-( I'm going mad... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Aube" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: RE: [squid-users] testing ntlm_auth shipped with samba 3 > > what are the advantages using ntlm_auth shipped with samba3 > > instead of the same shipped with squid ? > > The one shipped with Squid will not work with Samba 3, whereas the one > that ships with Samba 3 will. That's a big advantage. :) > > > Better using it with samba 2.2.8a, wb_group and wb_ntlmauth > > works, and there is no other ntlm_auth except from squid one! > > That is a choice only you can make. However, if you use AD now or plan > to use it in the future, I would recommend you use Samba 3 - the > integration is much better and lets you take advantage of the improved > security of AD over the NT 4 domain model. > > Note that there is a Perl-based winbind_group helper that works with > Samba 3, so you don't have to give up the group support in Squid if > you move to Samba 3. > > Adam > >
