>> If at all possible, please do upgrade to 2.5. That's always been my recommendation, but things move very slowly here .... that's why I need to try to keep things in a safe state prior to upgrading.
Regards
Jeff
--
Jeff Richards
Technical Consultant
Unix Enterprise Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +61 2 6219 8125
Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
che.org> cc: Marc Elsen <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, Squid Users
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/11/2003 08:51 Subject: Re: [squid-users] async i/o
|---------------------|
| ( ) Urgent(4 hours) |
| (*) Normal(24-48) |
| ( ) Low(72 hours) |
|---------------------| Expires on
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 08:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Probably the latest stable release.
>
> So there is no definitive "yes, it's stable in version X"?
>
> >> If not, what are your experiences ?
>
> No experience of it yet, but I've "inherited" a set of Squid
> recommendations from a past colleague, including implementation of async
> i/o. As this is 2.4.STABLE7 (not my decision), and is in production, I'm
> more than a little hesitant to go with this particular aspect of it.
>
> Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
I encountered a weird corruption issue with aufs on solaris with squid
2.4stable X. I suggest you use diskd.
If at all possible, please do upgrade to 2.5.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
(See attached file: signature.asc)
Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or
parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that
any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or dissemination of this communication is
strictly prohibited by several Commonwealth Acts of Parliament. If you have received
this communication in error please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies
of this transmission together with any attachments.
signature.asc
Description: Binary data
