On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Chris Selwyn wrote: > But it looked like the result of the previous "default" squidGuard rule was > not being interpreted as I expected by squid..
Or maybe squidGuard did not react as expected in response to a CONNECT request. > I was using a redirect in the default squidGuard rule to return http://... > etc.etc. > but squid was taking the bit before the : and looking that up in DNS. Hence > it was looking up http.matson.stc.com > > Any clues? CONNECT is very different from any other types or requests. Regards Henrik
