On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Andriy Korud wrote: > cache_dir diskd /cache1/squid 31000 38 256 > cache_dir diskd /cache2/squid 31000 38 256
1GB of RAM is cutting it close for a full 62GB cache. 2GB RAM would be much better in that situation. My cache is currently 26GB holding about 2.1 million objects, which is not even half the total size of your cache, and Squid is using 380MB of RAM. That means your cache will see at _least_ twice the memory usage of Squid, or at least 760MB. If you need performance more than hit ratio, I would definately suggest reducing the cache size. -- Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet - Available for IA32, IA64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures - x86-64, PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development - http://www.freebsd.org Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
