>>> Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/22/03 11:13AM >>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Pete Davis wrote:
>> I have been using squid for about 13 months+ with no problems >> (2.5.STABLE1-20021105). I tried to get into cachemgr and I only get >> "connect: (61) connection refused" (it says generated by cachemgr.cgi) . >Then you did not specify the correct server and/or port where cachemgr.cgi >should connect. This should be the same as your browsers are using for >talking to the proxy. >It may also be a firewall issue preventing cachemgr.cgi from talking to >the same. >> I have checked my firewall settings and port 80 to the server is >> allowed. Since it allows me to the cachemgr screen, I have ruled out a >> firewall problem. >This test does not rule out the firewall. >There is two traffic flows involved here > a) Browser <-> cachemgr.cgi on your web server on port 80 > b) cachemgr.cgi on the web server <-> Squid on the proxy port >It is not a login problem. >Regards >>Henrik >>>>>>>>>>>> Darn my stupidity. :( I kept using localhost but it needed the IP of the server. I must have been confusing it with some other server I use (not squid)... Thanks for the quick help. I have documented it properly so I don't have this brain cramp again. BTW, I almost had the big titles convinced to try 3 squid proxies to replace our single Volera. Since our current SLA allows us multiple ICS boxes for the same price, I couldn't make the argument about saving money (I couldn't convince them but I tried). The one I am running is a secondary gateway to the internet just for IT people to use (when the primary internet channel goes down mostly). Pete
