On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Paul Seaman wrote: > I have a PIII 1.3GHz (512MB of RAM) squid cache machine with a 160GB > secondary drive that I was going to use for a UFS cache. Are there > limitations on suggested cache size compared to available RAM, or will > this work OK as a 350+ user webcache? I guess what I'm asking is if > it'll be ok to use the full 160GB, or if I should use a smaller > cache_dir.
See the Squid FAQ on memory usage. Regards Henrik
