----- Original Message ----- From: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: galle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] delay pools and mrtg discrepancies v2
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, galle wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: galle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [squid-users] delay pools and mrtg discrepancies v2 > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, galle wrote: > > > > > > > squid -k parse -> say nothing. everything OK > > > > > > > > my delay pool settings: > > > > > > > > delay_pools 1 > > > > delay_class 1 1 > > > > delay_parameters 1 68000/68000 > > > > delay_access 1 allow all > > > > > > Looks good. This should give you approximately 68000 bytes/s (exacly > > > 68000 on average). > > > > > > Have you used any strange configure options? There is some hack options > > > (with hack in their name) which can have odd effects... > > > > > > Regards > > > Henrik > > > > I have not use any strange options! > > this is the output of a squid -v: > > Squid Cache: Version 2.5.STABLE3 > > configure > > options: --prefix=/usr/local/squid --enable-auth=basic --enable-snmp --enab > > le-delay-pools > > > > should i use: > > delay_parameters 1 68000/1 > > to strictly force the 68000 bytes/s ? > > No. this will result in some very odd rates... (this makes a bucket which > can only holds 1 byte/s..) > > Regards > Henrik Is there a "recommended" value for the MAX part in the delay_parameters line ? I mean...Is there a recommended size for the bucket ? Or should i use the same number for the RESTORE and for the MAX parts For example: 68000/68000, or 128000/128000....... Thanks
