On 31.03 16:48, Greg Swallow wrote: > Assuming documentation at > http://www.bowiesnyder.com/writings/caching_shtml.htm is true, my > squid-based reverse proxies shouldn't be caching HTML documents that are > server parsed. However, it appears that the four reverse proxies I have > sitting in front of my webservers are?
Well, caching depends on headers like Last-Modified, Expires: and Cache: you can make uncacheable static pages as long as cacheable dynamic pages. I'd check all headers that client and server send, to be sure if that's a bug, or those pages are made in the way they can be cached (why not to cache a page that hasn't changed?) > Also according to this documentation, I should be able to test whether > or not Apache is responding to IMS requests by checking for HTTP 304 shouldn't that be 306? > result codes in my webserver logs. I don't see any -- I just see 200's > for the affected web content. I think this started happening when I > upgraded from 2.5-stable1 to 2.5-stable4. Has anyone else run into this > problem? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 2B|!2B, that's a question!
