Hi, so it it right to say that a TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS = TCP_MISS, just that we cannot see it as anoter entry inside the access.log file. Also, we will not know the corresponding error HTTP status code (e.g. TCP_MISS/403......).
Rgds ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lizzy Dizzy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:13 AM Subject: Re: [squid-users] Another TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS question. > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote: > > > Sorry, Just another question to add, so if the object is retrieved from > > origin site, will there be another new entry inside access.log that says > > TCP_MISS for the object that could not be found inside the cache disk(and > > which is subsequently requested from the origin server)? > > No. Only one entry in access.log. The client only sent one request, and > Squid only made one request. It is only that Squid at first thought it had > the object in the cache but then when trying to access the cached object > found it not to be true, Squid then automatically continues and fetches > the object from the Internet instead, as if the object did not exist in > the cache. > > Regards > Henrik >
