Thanks for the interesting link, David.

But squid list is devoted to helping by sharing info. So there should be no
such thing as "reply to sender only". If everyone replies to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] then atleast we have a guaranteed archive entry
which will eventually benefit other users. I don't think anyone bothers with
posting a summary here. The only group I've seen which summarises after
every problem resolution is hp unix group.

Cheers,
Prash

-----Original Message-----
From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 May 2004 19:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] one thing that annoys me




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Can I request the administrator to enable this "reply to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" please?

I prefer it the way it is.  I can reply to the message author by just
hitting 'Reply', or to the list as well by hitting 'Reply To All'.  It gives
more options than I'd have if Reply-To were set to the list.  Besides, the
way it is now reduces list traffic by preventing accidental posts to the
list.

This article I found a while back sums up my feelings on the matter pretty
well:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Reply via email to