Thanks. I suppose I do not need to rebuild the cache (./squid -z). But what
makes you conclude that "FreeBSD diskd is the better choice. Under Solaris
and Linux use aufs."?
Regards
Liz
From: "Elsen Marc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lizzy Dizzy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [squid-users] diskd VS aufs
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:00:43 +0200
> Hi all,
>
> I've read that aufs and diskd are much much better than ufs.
> I am trying to
> decide between the two.
>
> I've read that aufs is the better one (in terms of performance), but
> probabability of crashing is higher?
I haven't seen problems with my aufs based configuration in months....
>
> I am willing to sacrifice a bit of performance gain but would
> like to have
> maximum stability. Can anyone advice which would be the better choice?
>
The choice is OS dependend : under FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
Under Solaris and Linux use aufs.
M.
_________________________________________________________________
Find love on MSN Personals http://personals.msn.com.sg/
